Pre Planted Bombs

Headlines

Peter Powers Complicit Dupe? full story...

Foreign Security Firms on 7-7 full story...

The Ghost Trains of London 7-7 full story..

The Number 30 Bus 7-7 full story...

Pre Planted Explosives of 7-7 full story..

Headline full story...

Headline full story...

Headline full story...

Headline full story...

 

 

 

“PRE-PLANTED EXPLOSIVES.”
Witnesses of the tube-train explosions state that there were no Muslims with backpacks, and no backpacks, or bags, left unattended on the trains, in the carriages that blew up, and that the floors of the trains blew upwards from underneath, not downwards, as would be the case with explosives inside the trains.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Explosives underneath the train floors; powerful enough to rupture the carriage floors and bend them upwards; would also lift the carriages up off the rails and derail them, as did happen.
Those explosives were not home-made, but military-grade high-explosives, that would not be available to Muslim suicide-bombers.
The official story was that they used home-made explosives, which has later been proven to be a lie.
So we know, from reliable eye-witnesses, who can be traced, that there were no backpack home-made bombs or Muslim bombers inside the tube-train carriages that blew up, and that the floors blew upwards, so the bombs, which were made from military high-grade explosives, must have been fastened underneath the floors of the train carriages.
Only people having access to the tube-trains, during the times that the trains were not running, would be able to plant those bombs, under the train floors.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Finance Minister, said that he was warned by Scotland Yard; not to leave his hotel-room, on the morning of 7/7/2005, before the first explosion was reported; implying that they had foreknowledge of the plan.
Scotland Yard then quickly denied being the ones who provided the warning, but have not told us who did warn Netanyahu, if they did not.
Why was Benjamin Netanyahu warned, but not the British people who pay their wages, and whom they are paid to protect?
Was it because it would have spoiled their evil plan, to murder British people, to change the nation’s mind, about British troops fighting in the Middle-East?
Two weeks later the head of the Israeli Mossad, General Meir Dagan, said that he had warned Benjamin Netanyahu at 08.40 AM, on 7/7/2005, ten minutes before the first blast occurred.
How did he know what was going to happen in London, if Scotland Yard did not warn him?
Did he wait, to warn Benjamin Netanyahu, until it was too late to warn the British people, so as not to spoil their evil plan?
Was the London bombing a covert MI5 operation, or an Israeli Mossad operation, or a joint operation by both of them?
The British people have the right to know.
Tony Blair said on the day of the explosions, that, “We KNOW this was done in the name of Islam”, when there was no proof whatsoever of who had done it, therefore indicating he possibly had foreknowledge of the plan and who they intended to blame, and the reason why they were going to blame the Muslims.
As proof that this was a slip-up, and needed covering up, look at how the BBC later falsely reported his actual words, giving further proof that the BBC is a government propaganda machine and the coverage was “organised”, exactly as Michael Portillo said it would be, in the BBC Panorama programme in May 2004.
"In addition I welcome the statement that has been put out by the Muslim Council of Great Britain. We know that these people act in the name of Islam..."
Statement from the PM following COBR meeting
"In addition, I welcome the statement put out by the Muslim Council who know that those people acted in the name of Islam..." BBC: In full: Blair on bomb blasts
Later that same day, Efraim Halevi, a former head of the Israeli Mossad, wrote in an article published on the Jerusalem Post website, at 18:10 PM (London time), that the attacks had been carried out simultaneously with "near-perfect" execution.

How did he know they had only been “near-perfect”?

How could he have known what the "perfect" results should have been, in order to know that the actual results were not perfect, unless he was in on the plot?
 
How many more people had they intended to murder, in order for it to be considered "perfect" execution?

How did he know, at least two days before the London authorities released the information on the 9th of July, that the bombs were detonated simultaneously, unless he was in on the plot?

As proof that this too was a slip-up, the Jerusalem Post article in question was completely removed from their website, after people began to ask similar questions.

The following day Police Commissioner Ian Blair also made a slip-up, on camera, and said that there were four miserable bombers, and then very quickly corrected himself, showing that he too possibly had foreknowledge of the plan to use four Muslims as patsies.

We are told that the first reports were of an electrical power-surge that occurred, and then later we were told that there were bombs that exploded on the tube-trains, and that it was an Al Quaeda terrorist attack, with Muslim suicide-bombers carrying backpack home-made explosive-devices onto the tube-trains.

A couple of weeks later, a Brazilian contract electrician is brutally and publicly murdered, on a tube-train, and again we are told lies by the police and media, about him.

He was a contract electrician.

For whom had he been working, and what had he been working on, in the days leading up to the 7th of July 2005?

Remember that the first reports from the media about 7/7/2005 were of an electrical power-surge, and Jean Charles de Menezes was a contract electrician.
 
Was he hired, as part of the terrorist exercise’s 1000 people, to wire up devices for mock-explosions, to be set off by a power-surge?

Did he see the explosive-devices being fastened under the tube-train carriage floors, and later realise what had really happened, and was starting to talk about it?

Did THEY (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) publicly execute him, to shut him up, and as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut?

We have been unable to find out where he worked. We know about his cousins who live in London, and his family coming over from Brazil, but we do not know where he worked.

 Why?

Who is the person calling himself Richard Jones, and claiming to have been next to the suicide-bomber on the bus, and a witness to the bus-bombing, and why did he tell so many lies?

Why did Peter Power smirk, grin and giggle, when he spoke about the “coincidence”, that the exercise had turned out to be real, when lots of people had been killed and injured?
 
What is funny about that?

 

The probability of the 7/7/2005 Drill and Attack Coinciding, without being planned to coincide, in a 10 year period is: ONE Chance 715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
This is absolutely mind-boggling.
The chances for these two events taking place at the same time, let alone in the same locations, are astronomical (numbers so big we had to look up how to say them).
And these estimates are within a very conservative five year mean.
In other words, most statistical analysis that is designed to create the impression of a similarly incredible improbability is usually framed within a greater amount of time: 50 years since England began experiencing bombings, 130 years since the Tube first opened, etc.
We don't need to frame these results in that way, because the chance is so low, that these events would ever occur simultaneously, without some sort of intervention, that one might go so far as to call it impossible.
Probability of 7/7 Drill and Attack Coinciding
London Underground Stations: 274
    
RELATED: Explosions In London
Probability of one attack by hour (5yr mean): One chance in 9,474,920
Open Hours per Day: 19
Probability of 3 station terror hit (5yr mean): One chance in 850,602,500,906,920,000,000
Open Days a Year: 364
Mean Sample frequent (yrs): 5.
Probability of one attack by hour (10yr mean): One chance in 18,949,840
Mean Sample frequent (yrs): 10.
Probability of 3 station terror hit (10yr mean): One chance in 6,804,820,007,255,360,000,000
Same Time 3
London Underground Stations: 274
Probability of drill on 1 stations per hour: One chance in 817,342
Open Hours per Day: 19
Probability of drill on 3 stations per hour: One chance in 546,023,643,432,766,000
Open Days a Year: 157
Same Time 3
PROBABILITY OF DRILL AND TERROR ATTACK COINCIDING BY CHANCE (10yr mean): One chance in 3,715,592,613,265,750,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Estimate of Grains of sand in the whole world: 7,500,000,000,000,000,000
http://www.miamisci.org/tripod/whysand.html
http://www.miamisci.org/tripod/whysand.html
In context:
If I go to a beach, or a desert, or under the sea and pick a single grain of sand.
What chance is there of you going to the same part of the world, by chance, and picking up the same grain?
You are trillions of times more likely to do this, than the London drill coinciding with this attack at that hour.
I wonder why the media aren't investigating the drill??
Why are Peter Power, Verint Systems, Richard Jones, Commissioner Ian Blair, the anti-terrorist branch who shot and murdered these innocent people, the Israeli Mossad, Tony Blair and the government itself not under investigation for these horrendous crimes?

The TRUTH About The London BOMBINGS

About Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2009 Produced by The FREEDOM COLLECTIVE GROUP All Rights Reserved